ISIS remains a threat. In other parts of Syria where it was routed, its fighters continue to launch attacks from their remote desert hideouts. Similarly, in Iraq, ISIS has gone underground but has continued to stage attacks.
Last Thursday, the top commander in charge of the US military in the Middle East warned that ISIS in Iraq and Syria was going underground not to disappear into oblivion, but to regroup. Gen. Joseph Votel, head of US Central Command, said in his testimony before the US House of Representatives Armed Services Committee that the fight against ISIS was “far from over.”
Votel lauded the territorial defeat of ISIS as a “monumental military accomplishment,” whereby its territorial control was reduced from 34,000 square miles at its height down to “less than a single square mile.” But he warned that “the fight against (ISIS) and violent extremism is far from over,” and that the ISIS “population being evacuated from the remaining vestiges of the caliphate largely remains unrepentant, unbroken and radicalized.” He also noted: “What we are seeing now is not the surrender of (ISIS) as an organization but a calculated decision to preserve the safety of their families and the preservation of their capabilities… and going to… remote areas and waiting for the right time to resurge.”
Votel called for a “vigilant offensive” against ISIS to continue, targeting its “leaders, fighters, facilitators, resources and of course their toxic ideology.”
“What our focus has to be is working with our partners on the ground, as we are doing fairly effectively in Iraq now,” he added, saying that US intelligence, training and advice would be key to helping America’s local allies combat the remnants of ISIS.
What accounts for the resilience of ISIS and its core ideology?
First, its ideology still attracts enough misguided young people in Syria and Iraq who are frustrated, humiliated and marginalized without hope and without other alternatives. The Global Coalition Against ISIS has tried to challenge that corrupt
Second, the promised recovery and reconstruction — and with
Third, the lack of a political solution in Syria has helped ISIS capitalize on people losing hope. The triumphalist approach of the Syrian regime and its allies, as well as that of the returning sectarian militias in Iraq, further fuel young people’s discontent.
Fourth, President Donald Trump’s statements about US troop withdrawals may also have figured in ISIS’s calculations. They may have decided to wait out the Americans and come back when they are completely departed. While Trump initially announced his intention to fully withdraw the final 2,000 US troops from Syria, the US has since decided to maintain about 400 troops there. About half of them will be stationed in northeast Syria to help prevent
Fifth, Iraq has taken major steps toward normalizing its political landscape in terms of successful parliamentary elections and the formation of a stable coalition government, but genuine reconciliation between the different political groups has not taken place; not between Sunni and Shiite political blocs and not within each sect.
Sixth, abusive practices by sectarian militias may be the most effective recruitment tool utilized by ISIS. In Iraq in particular, international donors must prioritize aid and training to local police units, together with the placement of international observers to build trust and support among the population recently freed from ISIS. Those local police units should completely replace army, counter-terrorism (CT) units, and sectarian militias from urban areas. The army and CT units can then focus on challenging ISIS’s influence in ungoverned spaces outside the cities.
For these reasons, it is unlikely that ISIS’s territorial loss will result in its demise. The global coalition, and its individual